Vote "NO" SPLOST on March 2, 2004 |
Vote "NO" to protest the continuing mismanagement and boondoggles of the past 2 SPLOSTs. Vote "NO" to delay the SPLOST until citizen oversight is in place to guide the process. Vote "No Confidence" in C Jack Ellis and Tommy Olmstead. Vote "NO" to correct the serious flaws in the proposed March 2 SPLOST.
Posted on Mon, Feb. 02, 2004 http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/7838418.htm
When I hear "overboard," the first picture that comes to mind is someone falling from a ship. This doesn't happen very often, I am happy to say. Another picture is tea being thrown overboard. This, I believe only happened once. Something comparable probably should happen more. Today's taxes are more than they were at the time of the Boston Tea Party. Our leaders have gone overboard with taxing. The chairman and the mayor like the idea of a SPLOST tax. To me SPLOST sounds like the sound a bug makes when you step on it. I believe taxpayers are tired of being stepped on. Money invested in government has diminishing returns. This needs to be turned around and tax be an investment that builds. The city and county was 3 percent for years. Now, sales tax is double, and they are wanting to SPLOST us again. When does the tax cow dry up? Bobby W. Chastain Macon |
is authored by NewTown Macon - a 501-C-3 non-profit corporation that seeks to gain funds for its worthy projects - most notably the universally popular and highly successful Riverwalk Greenway and the Ocmulgee Heritage Trail. Their questionably "neutral facts page" presents a glowing, optimists agenda for the SPLOST. NewTown does not state any -- concerns or negatives -- some are listed below - |
- The projected Recreation Plan will cost $160 Million. But the SPLOST only raises $60 Million for recreation - So - Which projects are not going to be funded? It is dishonest to show a $160 plan when the SPLOST does not raise enough money to build all the projects indicated. - Do they plan to sacrifice a ballfield or swimming pool or greenway trail? - Which items on the "complete list of recreation projects" are already dead? - What specific persons will oversee these difficult decisions and the job bidding process? - Where exactly are the proposed "new parks" to be located? - For exactly what purpose are the $30 Million in new bond debts? - Of the $19.2 Million "School Bonds to be retired" and the $37.3 Million "General Expenses Bonds to be retired" - what exactly was that money spent on? - Why not post a CPA detailed final report on those bond expenditures? - Why does NewTown site say " $29.5 Million in expansion and renovation to the jail are court ordered" ? The court told Bibb County to BUILD more Jail Space. The court did Not tell Bibb County how much money to spend !!! This expense would certainly be lower if citizens were watching the money and contracts. NewTown needs to be honest and just state the FACTs ! |
Posted on Sun, Feb. 22, 2004 http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/8011791.htm Trust a factor in whether SPLOST goes splat By Travis Fain Telegraph Staff Writer
In many ways the March 2 sales tax vote comes down to trust. Will voters trust public officials - some of whom may not be in office yet - to spend up to $160 million over the next several years as has been outlined? By law, they won't always have to. The law does set limits, but the five-member executive committee set up to determine funding priorities will decide what projects to fund and when to fund them. And since total collections won't be known until all the money comes in, critics of the special purpose local option sales tax worry that recreation - already not funded at the level they'd like - will suffer if collections are low.
County Commission Chairman Tommy Olmstead and Mayor Jack Ellis say there will be money up front for recreation projects. So does City Council President Anita Ponder, and those three make up a majority on the five-member executive committee, though Olmstead hasn't announced a bid for re-election and his term is up this year. The committee is locked in by the ballot language, which appears on this page, and, to some extent, by an intergovernmental agreement approved by both the City Council and County Commission. That agreement gets specific about projects and funding amounts, but the executive committee can vote to alter it. Olmstead said that would only be done in response to public opinion.
But that's not enough of a guarantee for some. "If you are wondering about distrust, ride out Houston Avenue," said City Councilman Henry Ficklin, part of a vocal anti-SPLOST movement.
He's referring to the south Macon road that is included in the last county SPLOST plan - one to fund roads. Construction on the project has been delayed, upsetting some area residents. On nearby Houston Road, some feel the roads program overbuilt by putting in a five-lane highway they didn't expect. Others feel burned by the current schools SPLOST, which has raised millions for new schools and renovations, but didn't build a high school in north Macon as voters expected. Olmstead said recreation projects listed in the intergovernmental agreement - about $60 million worth - will be built. He knows voters will be watching and that if elected officials want to seek another SPLOST in five years to fund more recreation projects - as has been discussed - he and other executive committee members must do what they promise. "I think we'll be judged over the next five years on whether we do what we said we would do," Ponder said. To contact Travis Fain, call 744-4213 or e-mail tfain@macontel.com |
http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/8011790.htm Posted on Sun, Feb. 22, 2004 SPLOST Q&A By Travis Fain - Telegraph Staff Writer
Here are answers to some basic, and some not-so-basic, questions about the SPLOST, as researched by The Telegraph, based on interviews with city, county and state officials and a review of public documents.
What does SPLOST stand for and what is it? Special purpose local option sales tax, a tax that only county commissions can authorize, which must be first approved by referendum. State law allows it to pay only for capital projects, such as roads or buildings, or to retire debt on capital projects that have already been built.
What will the new total sales tax be and how does that figure break down? Seven cents on each dollar spent, up from the current six. The sales tax would fall back to 6 cents on the dollar after March 2005, when the current schools SPLOST is set to expire. However, it would remain at seven cents if voters decide to renew the schools tax. Four of those 7 cents go to the state of Georgia. Another penny, an existing local option sales tax or LOST, is split between the city and the county. Another penny goes to the school board in a SPLOST for school construction that began in 1999. The seventh penny voters will decide March 2. Seven cents on the dollar is the maximum amount of sales tax allowed by state law.
What will this tax pay for? Here's what's included: $66.8 million to retire debt, specifically $19.2 million to retire school construction bonds initially issued in 1993, $29.5 million to cover bonds recently approved by the county to fund the court-ordered jail expansion, $16.2 million to pay off bonds used to build the Coliseum and $1.9 million to pay off city bonds issued in 1976. There's $60 million for recreation projects; see a full list on this page. About $4 million for a 350-space parking deck near City Hall and the city auditorium and another $8.7 million to move the tax commissioner's office out of the courthouse and build a 550-space parking deck near the courthouse. Also included: $500,000 for a new driver's license bureau, the location of which hasn't been decided. That's $140 million in projects. If the tax raises more revenue, officials have agreed that money will go toward more recreation projects.
How much money will the tax raise? No more than $160 million, not including interest, but the exact amount will depend on collections, which depend on how much people spend in Bibb County. Officials have estimated the tax will bring in $28 million a year for five years, which is how they arrived at a project list totaling $140 million. That estimate is based on current collections of a similar penny tax. The county's roads SPLOST, which ran from 1995 to 2000, collected about $126.7 million over five years, plus about $18.4 million in interest. Since this SPLOST is likely to be spent more quickly than the roads money, interest earnings "aren't going to be near $18 million," according to Bill Vaughn, the county's chief administrative officer.
What interest savings will be realized by retiring debt? Officials peg that number at $16 million, savings realized because existing bonds will be paid off much faster, allowing less interest to accrue. However, since the county plans to issue new bonds to finance projects before much of the sales tax revenue is collected, some new interest payments will be assumed. Vaughn estimates that interest at about $900,000. That's based on a preliminary plan to issue about $22.7 million in bonds up front. It's a rough estimate, given that bond interest rates, and the total amount of bonds that will actually be issued, are not yet known.
How will debt retirement affect future budgets? Debt savings will free up money in various county and city budgets for several years, potentially pre-empting tax increases. For the school board, retiring debt will free up about 1.2 mills a year in the school's millage rate, which is the rate used to compute tax bills. That's about $4.3 million that can go back into the schools budget in 2006, for example, according to figures from Vaughn. By paying off the jail debt the county commission will free up money in its general fund - to the tune of $2.3 million in budget year 2006, for example. That corresponds to about .66 mill in the commission's millage rate. The city will have an extra $955,000 a year in its budget from debt savings, according to Vaughn's figures. In addition, paying off the Coliseum bonds will free up, according to city and county numbers, about $376,000 a year in city and county hotel-motel tax revenues that have been used to pay down that debt. That money must be spent to promote tourism, but just how it would be spent would have to be decided by city and county leaders. When would the new tax start and end? It would start July 1 and end five years later, or after $160 million has been collected, whichever comes first. Officials expect the five years will expire first, and past SPLOSTs have followed this pattern.
What leeway will officials have to change what projects will be done, and how much those projects cost? A good bit. Officials must abide by the language of the referendum ballot, but that only sets out the various spending categories, such as the debt payoffs. The city and county have agreed on a list of recreation projects, and officials have said they will abide by that list. But the law allows them to add or delete projects or to alter the amount spent on them.
Who has the final say over what projects are done and in what order? According to the agreement between the county and the city, a five-person executive committee made up of the mayor, City Council president, County Commission chairman and vice chairman and a representative of NewTown Macon will decide when projects are done. State law grants most SPLOST powers to county commissions but this agreement gives ultimate spending authority to the executive committee, according to County Commission Chairman Tommy Olmstead.
What projects will be done first? Debt retirement will have the highest priority, according to the city-county agreement. After that, it depends on the executive committee.
The county can issue up to $35 million in bonds in order to have money on hand for projects without having to wait for collections to roll in, but a final decision has not been made on how much new bond debt to issue. Vaughn has drawn up a potential finance plan based on the assumption that the county will only issue $22.7 million in bonds up front. That would be $12.7 million to pay for parking decks and the new tax commissioner's office and another $10 million for the county and city to split for recreation projects. Other projects would be paid for as the sales tax is collected and the new bonds would not be used to retire existing debt. Both Olmstead and Mayor Jack Ellis have committed to funding some recreation projects in the first year of the tax.
Who's running the pro and con campaigns? Several area leaders have formed a group called Bibb SPLOST 04 to promote the tax. The campaign is chaired by John Shoemaker, CEO of Riverside Ford and former chairman of the chamber of commerce, and Bettye Hutchings, a retiree who has worked in recreation. As of Friday this group had collected about $15,500 and spent just under $10,000 on various brochures, advertising and neighborhood canvassing. On the con side, several area leaders are running campaigns. State Rep. David Lucas and his wife, City Councilwoman Elaine Lucas, have bought ads against the SPLOST, as has City Councilman Henry Ficklin. Former mayoral candidate and Libertarian David Corr is campaigning against it. So is local dentist and activist Lindsay Holliday and other members of CAUTION Macon, a group that organized to oppose roads projects financed by the last county SPLOST.
NewTown Macon isn't formally taking a position on the tax, but it is paying for a self-described educational campaign to inform voters what the SPLOST includes and what repercussions are expected if it does not pass. NewTown has hired Margaret Hylton Jones - the same woman being paid to run Bibb SPLOST 04's promotional campaign - to handle this effort. As of Friday NewTown said it had spent about $16,500 on its campaign. Also, the local convention and visitor's bureau and chamber of commerce, as well as various other local organizations, support the tax.
How will the money flow? Retailers collect all sales tax revenue and turn it over to the state, which takes its 4 cents on the dollar for the general treasury. The rest is distributed back to the county, minus an administration fee of 1 percent. It generally takes about two months from the time of a sale for the money to show up in county coffers.
How much is the sales tax in neighboring counties? The rate in Monroe, Crawford, Houston and Twiggs counties is 7 percent. In Peach and Jones counties it's 6 percent, but Jones County is set to increase to 7 percent this April. For a list of rates in all Georgia counties and more information about sales tax, see the Georgia Department of Revenue's Web site, www.gatax.org and click on the "sales and use tax division" link.
How will the new tax affect major purchases in Bibb County? With vehicle purchases, the state requires dealers to charge sales tax based on the county where a vehicle is delivered to the customer. Often dealers will deliver a vehicle to the customer's home if sales tax is lower there. Because of this, various car dealers said they expect a local sales tax increase would have little effect on business. Ken Jones, who owns a Macon electronics store called Ken's, said he expects minimal effects from the tax, though he does have some customers who travel to his Macon store because the current 6 percent sales tax is lower than they'd pay at home.
How much of the money will come from outside Bibb County? Because Bibb County is a shopping hub for Middle Georgia, officials have said about 40 percent of the sales tax revenue will come from outside the county, a figure based on a study from several years ago that counted out-of-county license plates at area shopping centers. The Georgia Department of Revenue has no records to show how much sales tax is actually paid by out-of-towners, according to a spokesman.
When this tax expires, will voters be asked to approve another one? Probably. One of the principal complaints about this SPLOST plan has been that not enough funding is earmarked for recreation projects. Olmstead has said the way to solve that is to do a good job spending this SPLOST, then ask voters to approve another one to fund more recreation projects. School officials have said they may seek another SPLOST when the current school building tax expires.
What have previous SPLOSTs accomplished and what are some complaints about them? The schools SPLOST funded construction of 10 new schools and renovations at another 14, according to a projects summary from the school board. Some people are upset because a new high school for north Macon, which was planned before the SPLOST passed, was delayed.
The county's roads SPLOST has built, widened or beautified dozens of roads, with more construction to come. But critics say some of the roads were overbuilt and there are concerns that planned widenings of Forest Hill Road and the Western Loop, which will include Tucker, Foster and Bass Roads, will be too large for the neighborhoods they run through. The roads program, which is run by an executive committee very similar to the one planned for the new SPLOST, spawned CAUTION Macon, a citizens watchdog group that has battled the roads program over some projects.
To contact Travis Fain, call 744-4213 or e-mail tfain@macontel.com |
Posted on Fri, Feb. 06, 2004 http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/7884625.htm Not the best deal A recent letter writer believes one can save on taxes by opting for the one cent SPLOST versus an increase in real estate taxes. Let's look at it a little closer. My real estate taxes increased $316.82 during the last five years, a yearly average of $63.36. And, if my present tax bill (which I consider average) was increased by one per cent it would add $13.78 per year totaling $68.90 for a five-year period. Conservatively, one might expect to spend an average of $175 per week ($25 per day) for life's essentials (food, gas, clothing, etc.). Under SPLOST rules, that's an additional sales tax of $1.75 per week, $7 per month or $84.00 per year. The total over the five-year lifespan of the SPLOST is $420. If one adds sales taxes for large purchases (such as cars, home appliances, etc.) the impact can be greater. The SPLOST is not the best deal, from a tax standpoint, for the average property owner purchasing goods in Bibb County. Lee Ballard Macon
I will not vote to increase my own taxes The writer of the letter, "Promote SPLOST," has fallen victim to blackmail. The threat of "Pass the SPLOST, or the property owners will bear the burden of the entire tax," is a threat made each time a SPLOST is recommended. Property owners must ensure the public servants understand raising property taxes will cost them their elected position. The report also stated, "40 percent of the money received will be paid by people outside Bibb County." I challenge the accuracy of this number. I believe it was fabricated to sway support. Apparently, it worked in one case. Contrary to The Telegraph's opinion that the SPLOST is "vital," I see nothing vital about it. Parking garages? The commercial garages have sufficient parking. I encourage the politicians to use them. This would give them the opportunity to walk the streets of Macon and converse with their constituents. Retire bond debt? Would money saved be returned to taxpayers? $60 million for recreation? The majority of taxpayers won't use the facilities. Let those who want the facilities pay for them. Charge fees, admission and parking. Expand the LEC? Cut frivolous spending to pay for it. I will never vote to increase my own taxes - not one penny. J. Sellars Macon |
Why not take the time to perfect this SPLOST for a November 2005 ballot? If these projects are worth doing... Aren't they worth doing right? Why is it important that oversight of this SPLOST be led by independent citizens? What caused the many grievous errors in the past two SPLOSTs?
|
Posted on Thu, Feb. 05, 2004 http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/7875337.htm Will vote 'no' I will vote "no" on the SPLOST unless there are funds included for much needed street repairs in south Macon. Houston Avenue is probably the worst maintained road in Georgia. It is probably the only road in all of Dixie where going the posted speed limit can damage a vehicle's suspension. Robert Moore Macon Houston Avenue is due to be fixed with funds from the road improvement SPLOST. -The editors. Read about the problems with the SPLOST for "Roads Improvements in Bibb County" - CAUTION Macon
|
"Recreation" wins an advantage by waiting for a better SPLOST in November 2005 This table compares money raised for recreation from a proposed March 2004 -vs- a November 2005 "50/50 SPLOST" Assuming $30 Million raised each year for 5 years for an average estimated total of $150 expected from either SPLOST.
Numbers above are $ Millions for [Bonds, Debt payments, Parking decks] -vs- [Recreation] The proposed November 2005 SPLOST would be a 50/50 concurrent split of money Contrary to those who say a delayed SPLOST will sink our hopes for a generation.. . The 2005 SPLOST will have More money in recreation by 2006. And it stays ahead. 2005 plan also offers some $ borrowing restraints on the Mayor and the Chairman by not paying off all their credit loans. |
Address to the Bibb County Commissioners at the 4th floor of the Bibb County Courthouse on September 9, 2003 by Lindsay D Holliday:
Bibb Commissioners: While I agree with many of the stated goals of the proposed new "recreation" SPLOST, I will not support a new SPLOST unless the two current SPLOSTs (Macon-Bibb Roads Improvement Project and the Pennies For Schools) clean up THEIR acts immediately. Bibb's track record for administering tax dollars raised by SPLOSTs is nothing short of disastrous.
History should not repeat itself. Any new SPLOST must have a clear commitment to the nature and scope of specific projects, much greater public input and oversight, and greater governmental responsibility. The "Pennies for Potholes" of the Macon-Bibb Road Improvement Program SPLOST turned into ill-planned projects and tax dollars for destruction of our neighborhoods. And we still have the potholes! Misinformation and "bait-and-switch" tactics must be precluded.
Proper oversight must include televised monthly meetings - nothing less frequently, and verbatim transcripts posted on the Internet. Local elected officials must retain full accountability. Taxpayers must know who is making the decisions, who is spending the money, and why. Transparent checks and balances must be in place so we do not suffer the boondoggles of the past two SPLOSTs. I am referring to Santa's Forest fiasco and the fraudulent designs perpetrated by the current Road Improvement Program.
The public deserves proof that elected officials can make these two tax programs work before we vote for new taxes.
If a private corporation is to be given the power to spend our tax dollars under the proposed SPLOST, as they were with the Road Improvement Program, then the name of the company and the terms of the contract must be made available for public inspection well before the vote. It must be clear that the funds will benefit the community, and not a private firm.
The public has been denied effective access to the public meetings of the Road Improvement Program, while the public's tax money continues to be spent by Moreland Altobelli, Inc under the "oversight" of "retired" Bibb County Engineer, Bob Fountain. Fountain has cancelled half of the monthly meetings where decisions are announced to a public forbidden to ask questions.
If the Executive Committee of the Road Improvement Program can not stop the many abuses of the current SPLOST, then I will have no faith in their ability to administer another SPLOST. Thank-you, - Lindsay D Holliday |
Posted on Sat, Jan. 17, 2004 http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/7731428.htm Lucas wants Macon sales tax vote delayed By Mike Donila Telegraph Staff Writer
With public opposition trickling in against the proposed penny tax, one Macon City Council member says she'd like to see the vote moved from March to November. Councilwoman Elaine Lucas, a vocal opponent of the sales tax, said Friday that unless more of the money from the new sales tax is used to fund recreation projects, she doesn't believe the referendum will pass.
The plan approved by the Bibb County Commission will allow the tax to generate no more than $160 million over five years, but officials have been planning to spend about $140 million on designated projects. Final collections will depend on sales during the life of the tax, which would be implemented July 1, if passed. Interest compounded over the years also will increase the amount available. Under the proposed allocation formula, $60 million will fund recreation projects; $30 million will pay for the jail expansion and renovation, and to retire debt on the jail; and the rest will mostly go toward new parking decks and paying off bond debts.
"I'd like to see it fail so we can go back to the drawing board and focus on recreation," Lucas said. "I'm not saying the other things aren't important, but recreation will make the biggest difference in people's lives." The special purpose local option sales tax was originally proposed to fund a $90 million parks and recreation master plan for the entire county. But city and county officials continued to butt heads during the past year about how they would allocate the money, what projects should be funded and how much should really go toward the master plan. In December, Mayor Jack Ellis and Commission Chairman Tommy Olmstead finally hammered out the current agreement, which will be included on the March 2 ballot for the presidential primary.
Lucas said she's going to ask council members to approve a resolution calling on the county to request that the vote be postponed until November. Under state law, the county must call for the vote. Commissioner Olmstead was out of town Friday and could not be reached for comment. Ellis on Friday said he expects the SPLOST to pass, but "we're all going to have to work hard for it to pass." "If we can have that type of capital expenditure in our community, think about how many people we can help and employ," the mayor said. "Think about how that money will turn over our city." Ellis added that 40 to 45 percent of the tax would be collected from shoppers outside the county. While Lucas said she could support a penny tax - if enough money was added for recreation - there's another movement making waves in the county that will oppose any additional SPLOST, no matter what it funds.
David Corr, the chairman of the local Libertarian Party and a former mayoral candidate, has launched a charge against the proposed penny tax. "Our local government is already taxing and spending way too much," Corr said. "We don't need more taxes. We need less government. We don't need government involved in recreation, period." Corr, who secured 25 percent of the votes as a write-in candidate in November's mayoral race, says Olmstead and Ellis cannot be trusted with the tax money. He questioned whether the two leaders would retire existing bonds and then replace them, and whether they would award contracts to companies "based on merit and competence rather than continue to award contracts based on skin-color and campaign contributions." Corr, who is also campaigning against the SPLOST on his Web site, www.davidcorr.org, called his effort a non-partisan movement that includes about 100 "rank-and-file" representatives from all political parties.
To contact Mike Donila, call 744-4296 or e-mail mdonila@macontel.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A few of many problems with the past 2 SPLOSTs in Bibb County |
Board of Education Goofs
Closing of Historic Redding School |
Macon-Bibb County Roads Improvement Program - SPLOST problems: Houston Road Flawed designs and lawsuits Lack of effective oversight documented - minutes from COC
|
Posted on Wed, Feb. 18, 2004 http://www.macon.com/mld/telegraph/news/editorial/letters/7974813.htm History lesson Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. Macon has endured two past SPLOST fiascoes and the lessons learned from those efforts should remind voters how poorly our elected officials have handled money. The rules governing SPLOST allows officials to shift money from one area to another. We learned this the last time. We learned we cannot trust our officials to wisely spend the $160 million this SPLOST will raise. The proposal includes $60 million for a grand recreation program. We don't need more ball fields and more swimming pools. We need an educational system that works so little Johnny can get a job! Little Johnny can't read, so he shouldn't be out playing ball. Little Johnny can't do math, so he shouldn't be allowed to go swimming. Little Johnny doesn't know history, so he is doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past, and his parents are also doomed to make the same mistakes if they think this SPLOST is the answer to our problems. Vote "no" to the SPLOST. J. Michael Cranford Macon
Resolution issues
The Telegraph's editorial board recently noted, "SPLOST money is not discretionary. It has to go toward the declared purposes." That's true to a certain extent. The Georgia special sales and use tax statutes (48-8-110G, 48-8-111G) are precise concerning pre-referendum procedures, but the law lacks clarity regarding post-referendum issues. The statutes are primarily devoted to pre-referendum matters. They include directions for creating a resolution specifying the purposes for which the proceeds of the tax are to be used, the maximum period of time for collection and they place limitations on the cost of the project. Not a word is devoted to post-referendum resolution issues including one to limit tinkering with the official pre-ballot resolution presented to voters and the election superintendent. Thus, the scope to which officials can revise a voter-approved resolution is a major flaw of the law. The statute's defect allows bureaucrats to lawfully implement major post-referendum revisions to a resolution presented at public forums - even though the majority may have voted for something quite different. For instance, in Bibb County, the SPLOST resolution was treated as a non-binding document wherein officials made ex post facto changes to the roads and schools programs. The public's reaction was newsworthy. The special tax statutes must be revised to eliminate the post-referendum loophole through which our public servants jump at every opportunity. Otherwise, the public outcry will not stop. Lee Ballard Macon
Sky is falling Oh no, the sky is falling! Charles Richardson would have you believe so, anyway. His column concerning a failed SPLOST is pure fiction. Like most proponents of the SPLOST, he reverts to using scare tactics instead of dealing with the facts. How convenient. The facts as I see them are that an inept local government is trying to raise our taxes yet again for unneeded (and mostly unwanted) projects. The local political leaders have tried to put enough pork into the SPLOST to convince individuals to vote in favor of the tax increase. Of course, the same pork barreling is used in Washington resulting in a skyrocketing federal deficit. Mr. Richardson would have us look forward rather than backward. I disagree. The best barometer of gauging future performance is based upon analyzing past history. Doing so in this case would ensure failure of this current nightmare of a SPLOST. J. Sellars Macon
I'll vote 'no' The best argument against the SPLOST is provided by NewTown Macon's own "nonpartisan" website. A map is provided to show all the promised recreation projects that the SPLOST will fund. Pretty impressive, if not a little too lofty, with something for everyone, all for just $60 million. However, at the bottom of the map in small print, it states: "Actual park locations my change over time to reflect changing needs and priorities of the community." Given the make-up of the governing body responsible for setting the needs and priorities of projects and their history of not playing nice with each other, do you smell turf wars, lawsuits, and broken promises? Think I'll vote "no" on March 2. D. Mooney Macon |
http://www.macon.com/mld/telegraph/news/editorial/letters/7983652.htm Posted on Thu, Feb. 19, 2004 It won't matter As I drive around Macon-Bibb County and I see all the cars at local businesses, I am shocked that we are even having to pay property taxes in Bibb County. According to the backers of the SPLOST, those out-of-town people are going to pay for everything. Until people who know how to manage start managing the government, it will not matter how much the sales tax is. It will just be blown away. It makes me feel sick when the blackmail approach is used on us, whether it is a SPLOST or higher property taxes. Council member Elaine Lucas's attitude is clear as to how this thing will work out. She was all for SPLOST until it did not suit her. Now SPLOST is not good. Vote "no" until we get some real managers in office. Ronald Ellington Macon
SPLOST extortion Regarding the local SPLOST vote coming soon, I think it's reprehensible for our elected officials to hold a gun to our heads to get it. As was reported, these officials are stating that they'll get the monies one way or the other. Either we have it shoved down our throats and approve the SPLOST, spread the tax across a wider base, or else the local property owners will have to suck it up and take the full blow themselves. Isn't this the definition of extortion? This kind of political leadership and reasoning was partially the motivation for the Boston Tea Party. I vote for another tea party, but this time throw out incumbent politicians! With a new staff that is more motivated by fiscal responsibilities (BOE, are you listening?), abiding by what's ethically appropriate (mayor, are YOU listening?) and developing sound budgeting practices, we might be willing to negotiate on a tax increase. It would seem our elected officials are trying to terrorize us into passing this SPLOST by utilizing the alternative property tax-increase nightmare. A penny spent wisely is a penny well spent, a penny given to a governmental body is a penny dropped into a wishing well; or more apropos, a hole in a ground. Brad DeFore Lizella |
Share the wealth In fairness, the SPLOST should be shared. One of Bibb County's greatest needs is a more efficient animal control system. Animals are allowed to stray; they have been neglected, abused or abandoned by unconcerned citizens of this community. Strays are a nuisance to property owners who are the taxpayers. Because there is a shortage of animal control officers, we continue to see these problems multiply. It is time for Bibb County to take a stand by providing safety and protection for its citizens and enforcing more humane treatment for animals. The city and county government are encouraged to appropriate money for animal control. Judith R. Gibbs Macon http://www.macon.com/mld/telegraph/news/editorial/letters/7993671.htm Posted on Fri, Feb. 20, 2004 |
Links at Macon State's - Government Directory
Vote "NO" to secrecy, waste, fraud and abuse. Vote for a better SPLOST in November 2005 |
Voters must Insist on full disclosure and oversight of meetings of the Bibb County Commission and the Bibb County Board of Education. Insist on webposting of all minutes - both provisional and final. Insist on taping and television broadcast of all meetings. Send these elected officials a message -->> Vote "NO" on SPLOST - March 2, 2004.